1 SHAMASH.ORG /usr/www/wwwhc/listserv/archives/heblang March 2000
2 51 26_RE: uvvinyan vs. ul'lameid21_Rosenfelder, Yehezkel36_Yehezkel_Rosenfelder@icominfosys.com30_Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:43:08 +0200586_iso-8859-1 The issue is (for a change...) not related to the vav sh'ruka or sh'va m'rahef (issues which have been discussed here, not necessarily in agreement...). The 2 examples brought should be similar (I don't always trust the accuracy of the publisher, for a start).<br><br>The 'identical letters rule' is mentioned by many (e.g. Rada"k in Michlol) but not agreed by all. Rav Breuer claims that most cases where there is no ga'aya, the sh'va will be NAX (see his book on Ta'amei Hamikra for details). e.g. read hatz'tzon (Gen 14, 8) but rivvot -- nax (Deut 33, 17). Note that [...]
54 45 14_RE: Halleluyah21_Rosenfelder, Yehezkel36_Yehezkel_Rosenfelder@icominfosys.com30_Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:48:04 +0200516_iso-8859-1 While we are on the topic, note that some see Halleluya as one word and others see it as two.<br><br>Yehezkel<br><br><br><br><br><br>-----Original Message----- From: Henry Churchyard [mailto:churchh@usa.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 1:08 AM To: Discussion of Hebrew Grammar and Etymology Subject: Re: Halleluyah<br><br><br><br>> From: MKAInc@aol.com<br><br>> Am I correct that the mappik in the final Heh of Yud. Heh (as in the > last word of Ps. 150) means that the noun Yud.Heh is feminine? [...]